Walking Seal Called Missing Link in Evolution
Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc? The thing about Evolutionary Science is that they are so sure when they make these kind of claims: “…called…might…evidence has been weak and contentious…might…almost…thought that…suggests…likely…possible preserved stomach contents suggest…researchers think that…”
Evolutionists refuse to accept the complete and sufficient truth of God.
Who really cares what happened to this supposed animal when there is nothing proof positive that it actually existed? Most of the "missing link" fossils turn out to be incorrect anyway. The article said that it ate a duck and a rodent, which means that other bones had to have been found with this supposed animal. Why is it that those bones arent possibly a part of the skeleton?
Just to be sure where God's position on this is, read Romans 1
The Ink: Robert Estienne (1503–1559)
33 minutes ago