Showing posts with label American Pride. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Pride. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

It's Time To Stop Wasting Time!!!

Remember this?



Well, it just ain’t Harlem voters that were ill informed.

John Ziegler, a former libertarian talk radio show host in LA, has been doing documentary and interview videos for Citizens United. He recently made an appearance on FNC’s Hannity and Colmes to talk about his new upcoming video, "Media Malpractice... How Obama Got Elected" featured at the website: HowObamaGotElected.com




The information he presented coincided with a Zogby Poll which described the following results:

512 Obama Voters questioned from 11/13/08-11/15/08 with a Margin of Error of +/- 4.4 points

Educational Demographics - 97.1% High School Graduate or higher, 55% College Graduates

Results to simple Multiple Choice Questions

57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing)
81.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing)
82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing)
88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing)
56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).

And yet.....

Only 13.7% failed to identify Sarah Palin as the person on which their party spent $150,000 in clothes
Only 6.2% failed to identify Palin as the one with a pregnant teenage daughter
And 86.9 % thought that Palin said that she could see Russia from her "house," even though that was Tina Fey who actually said that!!

Only 2.4% got at least 11 correct.

Only .5% got all of them correct. (And we "gave" one answer that was technically not Palin, but actually Tina Fey)

Here is the full promotional video:


A lot of people want to blame the voters for not getting informed, but I blame two groups:
- The main stream media which was overwhelmingly in the tank for Obama and did not give unbiased new reporting
- The INFORMED voters

I do believe that there were Obama voters who did know the issues and voted on him because of those issues. However, based on the Stern video as well as other factors, including the majority of news outlets who blatantly favored Obama, activist groups like MoveOn.org and ACORN, contemptuous bloggers at the Daily KOS and the Huffington Post, etc., it is very clear that the majority of people who voted did not have an informed grasp of the candidates or the campaign issues.

Because of those factors, the real blame falls on us, the informed voters of this nation. A lot of us did get out there to try and help educate people (our good friend SNOOPER comes to mind); more of us joined the various political action committees to help with education, but most of us blogged and did our best from behind the computers we used. AND THAT IS THE PROBLEM!

We can blog all we want, but unless we actually interact with people, they aren’t just going to login and read stuff at Hot Air or Powerline.

There is such a culture of fuzzy lies out there that people just don’t know what to believe anymore when it comes to politics.

George Washington had it dead on correct when he said, “Promote then, as an object of primary importance, Institutions for the general diffusion of knowledge. In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion, it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened."

Our nation’s public opinion has been kidnapped, raped and murdered by those with an agenda that is not in the best interest of America, and by God’s will of His majestic grace, it is time that the people of this nation take it back.

We have got to convince our fellow Americans that “We the people” means the ones who do the voting, not the elites in the media, on Wall Street or in the respective governments of this nation. When someone has the courage to run for public office, and if they are granted the will of the people to be elected or appointed to that office, then it is to the people they owe their allegiances and it is the people to whom they serve!

We can start now, or we can waste our time complaining about why our guy lost and wait until the next primary season to promulgate truth and facts to the people of this nation.

Don’t wait for the candidates or their campaigns or even the PACs to spread the word. Get out there among your friends and neighbors and start campaigning for America’s future now. Help give them the tools they need to make an informed decision at election time. That way, even if the other guy wins again, at least it will be because people voted the issues and their conscience and NOT because they fell in love with an IDOL and couldn’t tell us about the candidate, the running mate or their opponents or the issues.

It’s time for us to do our part for America’s future and our fellow Americans!

It’s time for us to lead a new revolution to take back what has wrongly been taken from us!

It’s time for us to let the people in power know that their power is fleeting and is predicated on what WE say and do!

It’s time for us to bypass a recent campaign slogan and truly put COUNTRY FIRST!

It’s time for us to realize that it is up to US to live up to our rights of “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness!”

It’s time for us to stop following the trends of this world and lead the world in truth and justice!

It’s time for us to stop taking notice of how wrong everyone else is and start standing up for what is right so that others will take notice!

It’s time for us to help every American understand again that the government of this nation is truly of the people, by the people and for the people!

Friday, October 17, 2008

And That One Wonders Why We Question His Patriotism

Obama Campaign yanks the National Anthem in favor of more speakers and more speaking time

Thursday, October 16, 2008

Who Won the Debate? A TRUE PATRIOT!





Barack Obama says it here:

Through hard work, you get taxed more.

Even though it’s totally irrelevant to you now… If you are successful, you should be grateful because if I were president when you were struggling, you would have had a tax cut. Then you could have saved so that I would be able to tax your frugalness and hard work.

I appreciate that you have worked hard and saved, BUT… You need to be taxed more because you have worked hard.

I don’t WANT to punish your success, BUT… I want everyone to have that same opportunity at success so I can say I don’t want to punish their success as well.

I like the flat tax, BUT… The problem is that it seems too fair and doesn’t punish the wealthy.

And here’s the ABSOLUTELY ASTONISHING SOCIALIST zinger!

“I think that when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.” – Barack Obama, October 14, 2008

Who won?



Joe "The Plumber" Wurzelbacher is the winner. But not just him.

Now there are a ton of everyday, regular people who are starting to realize they won as well. It is great that the election has finally become about Joe the Plumber AND:

Mikey the Electrician
Suzy the Beautician
Leo the Cable Guy
Janey the Diner Cook
Petey the Cabbie
Kelly the Daycare Worker
Jackie the Butcher
Donna the Realtor
Johnny the Enbalmer

And when these folks get into the voting booth, who are they going to think about when it comes to the best person to be the leader of the free world?

It ain’t the guy who is going to tax hard word and success.

It ain’t the guy who believes that America is a mediocre place.

It ain’t the guy who wants to take the rewards of your hard word and share it with everyone else.

It ain’t the guy who doesn’t believe that life begins at conception.

It ain’t the guy who believes that small town Americans CLING to bibles and guns.

It ain’t the guy who was raised and mentored by Marxists and Muslims, and atheists.

It ain’t the guy who thinks we should follow the world rather than lead it.

It ain’t the guy who doesn’t understand that your associations are a part of what defines you.

And it ain’t the guy who throws those associations and friendships away when they can hurt his political career.

Friday, September 19, 2008

Excerpt from Gov. Palin on FNC’s H&C

There is no doubt in my mind, even IF she didn’t have the experience she does, that Sarah Palin is ready for national leadership.

Transcript excerpt from interview of GOV. PALIN ON 'HANNITY & COLMES,' PART 2




“The shots that perhaps our campaign has taken, it's nothing compared to the shots that some people across America are taking today. The things that really matter: Somebody worried about losing their house because of Wall Street collapses. Somebody worried about losing their job or being able to pay for their child's health care coverage or a parent perhaps having lost a son or daughter in battle, those are the shots that matter.” – Gov. Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin truly has a servant’s heart! “For those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.” - Matthew 23:12

No she isn’t the Messiah. But it seems more and more apparent that she is trying to follow His example.

Sarah Palin ~ Liberty Belle by joitheartist

McCain ~ Palin 2008

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Ah. The Military Spin Spins That Proverbial Web

”This Close to a Chest Full of Medals” From Monica Crowley


"…I actually always thought of the military as an ennobling and, you know, honorable option. But keep in mind that I graduated in 1979. The Vietnam war had come to an end. We weren't engaged in an active military conflict at that point. And so, it's not an option that I ever decided to pursue." – Barack Obama on This Week with George Stephanopoulos – 9/7/08

Now, from the Monica Memo:

“This is all kinds of wrong.

“First, for a guy who supposedly poured his whole life into the pages of not one but two memoirs, there is not a single mention in either of them of a desire to serve in the military.

“Second, he says he decided against it because the Vietnam war was over and we weren't involved in a hot war.

“So I guess Obama thinks peace and freedom just sort of happen by themselves. That we don't need a military in times of peace, because, you know, there's not a lot of stuff going on. That we only need a military when stuff does go down in the world, when the threat is on our doorstep, then by golly, we'll whip a military in no time! He doesn't seem to get that peace and freedom happen BECAUSE of a strong, deterrent force.

“Just when you think you've heard all possible naivete from this guy, he hits you with more.

“What's obvious is that when… Obama [is] feeling the heat, they trot out some ridiculous story about having wanted to go to boot camp… because he's losing traction to his war hero opponent.

“When in doubt, Democrats put on an imaginary uniform and spin a wispy fairytale of "almost" heroics.”

-------------------------------------------

0bama voted AGAINST those noble and honorable men and women he “thought” about joining. Was he thinking about it while he was enjoying the point of inhaling or when he could afford some blow?

Apart from his “clouded” memory and description about signing up for Selective Service when he graduated from high school in 1979, Crowley brought up some great points here. However, there were three significant events in 1979 that would have a true patriot consider military service in 1979.

In Iran, American hostages were taken when the Ayatollah Khomeini seized control of power.

The Soviets invaded Afghanistan which heated up the Cold War.

In South Korea, an important ally of ours, there was an unsuccessful presidential coup after the assassination of President Park.

0bama may have thought about joining the military but didn’t see a need and yet the world that very year gave a very patriotic need.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Inspirations, Introductions and Biographical Videos from the 2008 RNC Convention

For perpetual Posterity.

In Memoriam:


Service:


President Ronald Reagan:


Medal of Honor Story:


George Herbert Walker Bush:


Abraham Lincoln:


Teddy Roosevelt:


Wave the Stars and Stripes:


Prosperity:


Economic Reform:


Gov. Sarah Palin Introduction Video:


9/11: The Day the World Stood Still:


America's Place in the World:


Country First: Peace:


Sen. John McCain Introduction Video:

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

McCain needs us to do our very best

This year’s RNC Convention has spoken one main thing to me. Those of us who blog and host or participate in Online Radio Shows have a responsibility of leadership that is beyond what the RNC staffers can do. We have a load to carry and that how far we carry it might be the difference between President McCain and President Obama.

We cannot afford to give up or call this election lost. John McCain was not my initial choice because I felt that he was giving his very best for conservatism in Washington. I have since changed my attitude. John McCain has continually given his very best throughout his career. He gave his body to his nation…twice. He has led in a way that is not always popular or even in agreement with his party, but he led.

And now John McCain needs us to do our very best for him. The stakes are too high not to give our very best.

We cannot let disputes distract us from doing our very best.

We cannot let personal preferences distract us from doing our very best.

We called out to John McCain when we doubted his ability to lead the conservative base and he did his very best by providing a conservative running mate.

We have a duty to do our very best for our country but doing our very best for John McCain.

The following video is from the movie “Facing the Giants.” It is a football movie with a Christian tone and lesson. But I believe the following scene speaks to us as conservatives who support John McCain. It is an inspiring scene that should inspire you to give your very best and never give up.



McCain ~ Palin 2008

Thursday, August 28, 2008

The Speech That Changed Me Forever

During the Heading Right Convention Night, I was given a very humbling introduction by Danger Girl.


In that intro, she mentioned a speech by Ronald Reagan that changed forever the way I looked at politics. That speech is below.

It was 23 years ago and I was 16. My dad, who was still active duty military at the time, had a friend who was the logistics coordinator for the military aircraft used by the President and Vice-President, and he was able to get my dad two tickets to the Prelude to Independence celebration going on in Williamsburg, Virginia. I still have that ticket.

Prelude to Independence ticket

My dad could have taken my mom or even another friend, but he checked with my school and was able to have this counted as a field trip, as long as I would write about it for my history class.

So, on Thursday morning, May 30th, 1985, my dad and I put on coat and tie and drove from our home in Poquoson, VA to Colonial Williamsburg. I was overwhelmed by the security. I remembered about the attempt on Reagan’s life in DC, but I never really expected to have to be screened in such a way. I had to show my military dependent ID and my student ID. I had to let them frisk me and run the wand around me to ensure I wasn’t dangerous. As a 16 year old, whose thoughts were normally on rock and roll and the fairer sex, I was getting a bit agitated. But there wasn’t a way I could tell my dad to get us out of there.

Mind you, my parents have always been conservative in their politics. They never really talked about who they voted for but mainly about the issues of the day. At that time, I was discovering my love for practicing and performing music and was starting to set my goals in that direction. My dream was to replace Doc Sevrinsen on the Tonight Show. So Politics and politicians never really spoke to me….at least I never really wanted to hear them. Then along came Ronald Reagan. With him as President, I began to see a love of country and pride in what America could do. Yet I was still too young to vote so I just went along with the good feeling.

Back to Williamsburg in 1985. It was a warm and sunny morning and in my coat and tie, I was sweating. We got there early and had been seated and waiting for over an hour. My dad did his best to engage me with conversation about things of family and school but I was getting impatient. Then the announcement came and President Reagan took the dais.

Ronald Reagan spoke of his tax proposal for this new term. There were points made that inspired pride and points that brought laughter. He was the great communicator after all.

As I stated above, I was to write something for my history class. Well, taxes weren’t inspiring me much. After all, my measly after school and weekend yard work job was under the table, so I never saw anything taken away from me yet. I worked hard and was paid.

Then President Ronald Wilson Reagan said something that struck me to my core. In fact, I heard his words and they echoed around my noggin again and again. I still remember those words to this day:

“Our forefathers fought a revolution for two reasons: to give liberty to a naturally independent people and to secure, in the words of a Burgess who met here, ‘...Prosperity in the Community and Security to Individuals.’ The idea of freedom impelled them; it intoxicated them. And it is freedom that impels us still.”



WOW!!!!

Taxes started to mean something to me; politically, historically, and PERSONALLY!

I had a new respect for what my dad did and that he was working hard to not only support his family but to have his money taken away from him to support the government as well.

I realized then that republicanism was for the PEOPLE and liberalism was for the government. I knew what I wanted to write for school. I don’t remember exactly what it was but it started with the quote above and continued with the history of federal taxation. And I believe my final statement was something on the order of: Prosperity and security have to go hand in hand in America. This nation can only survive and succeed if we take them as equals and not sacrifice one for the other by over taxing the population.

From that moment on, I knew that I was a conservative when it came to politics. I knew that when I went into the ballot box for the first time in 1988, that my vote wasn’t just for me but for the nation and for America’s place in the world.

-SK

------------------------------------------------
Remarks at the "Prelude to Independence" Celebration in Williamsburg, Virginia
May 30, 1985


Thank you, ladies and gentlemen, Governor Robb, Senator Trible, Mayor Walker, and distinguished members here of the Williamsburg Foundation, the officials of that organization, and you ladies and gentlemen.

It is very good to return to this city which is so closely associated with the birth of the American Republic. Boston is called the Cradle of Liberty, Philadelphia is where the Liberty Bell first rang, but Williamsburg, too, has an honored place in our history and our hearts. Because, as you have been told, here a practical plan for American self-government and a declaration which became the basis for the Bill of Rights of our Constitution were written, endorsed, and sent out to the world by the Virginia Legislature.

Here the arguments against unjust taxation rang out like a firebell in the night, and the chief arguer, Patrick Henry, gave our movement for independence the one thing it needed to become a revolution -- he gave it passion.

And here, through long hours of great debate in the capitol behind me, the people of the colony evolved irresistibly from British subjects to American patriots.

And so, I'm happy and honored to speak in Williamsburg today. For I, too, mean to speak of liberty and a practical plan to increase its measure in our country. I wish to speak also of the philosophical underpinnings of that plan, for whatever happens to it, I mean for it to be understood.

Two nights ago I unveiled our proposal to revolutionize the Federal tax code. I spoke of the system as it is now, and as we wish it to be. But just for a moment today I want to note how our modern tax system evolved from a modest attempt to raise modest revenues to the behemoth to which we are currently beholden.

The Federal income tax only began in 1913. At that time some strange things happened. When it was being debated in the Congress one man spoke prophetically -- or I should say, very honestly when he said, ``We don't need this tax for government's needs. We need it for government's wants.'' And he was pretty prophetic, but there was another man that was almost laughed out of public life and public office, a Senator who said, ``If we pass this amendment, we may very well see the day when the government could think it could take as much as 10 percent of a person's earnings.'' [Laughter] They thought that was a pretty ridiculous statement.

Well, this income tax was instituted because the Federal Government needed more money to operate because there was a widespread feeling that the rich ought to contribute to the system that made their riches possible. It was a system aimed almost exclusively at the wealthy, a class tax, as opposed to a mass tax.

The first tax rates were low. The 1913 income tax imposed a top personal rate of 6 percent. And you had to report an income of more than a half a million dollars a year to pay it. The poor and the middle class paid nothing. The personal exemption was $3,000. Now you know why they're called ``the good old days.'' [Laughter]
During the First World War tax rates were increased, but they were relaxed again during the 1920's. Right up until the eve of World War II, the Federal income tax was still a tax limited to the wealthy. It affected only 4 or 5 million people, and their taxes yielded, in all, less than 20 percent of the Nation's revenues.

But during and after the war a great change came -- tax rates were increased, exemptions were reduced, and inflation brought more people into the tax structure. Withholding was introduced for the first time, and suddenly just about every working American was paying the Federal income tax. And the tax suddenly was the largest single component of government revenues.

What followed, we know too well -- the tax system began to grow and grow, rates were pushed higher, more and more people found themselves paying more and more money. Ironies abounded. As the tax system grew bigger and more powerful, it also grew more incompetent. And as it demanded more to pay for programs to better our lives, it became more heartless.

Seventy-two years after its inception, what is our Federal tax system? It's a system that yields great amounts of revenue, yes, but even greater amounts of discontent, disorder, and disobedience. It's a system in which the top personal tax rate rose to 94 percent. And it only came down from those heights when a young man named John Kennedy decided some time back that while it's all right for the Federal Government to be your partner, it's not quite fair that he be your boss.

It's a system from which no full-time wage earner is exempt. Now, almost everyone, no matter what their circumstances or their special needs, must pay. In fact, so many pay so much that someone has figured out that it takes the average taxpayer until almost May every year before he starts working for himself. Up till then, he's working for the government.

It's a system that allows an exemption of barely over $1,000 a year for each child born into a family, an exemption so utterly out of touch with the realities of everyday life that it serves as a metaphor for exactly how ridiculous the entire structure is.

It's a system that increasingly treats our earnings as if they were the personal property of the Government, with decent citizens called before the Internal Revenue Service to answer for their income and expenditures and show their papers and their proof in a drama that is as common as it is demeaning. Wasn't there a line a couple of hundred years ago about being safe in your books and your records?

Well, it's a system so utterly complex and ultimately inexplicable that half the time the tax professionals themselves aren't sure what the rules are -- a system that even Albert Einstein is said to have admitted he couldn't begin to fathom. You know, it's said that his hair didn't look that way until after he experienced his first tax form. [Laughter]

It's a system that is antigrowth and antiproductive for it discourages the very virtues that make a man and woman valued contributors to society. You know this if you've ever worked overtime to pay for your child's braces. The money you earn is taxed at so high a rate as to render your extra efforts almost totally without point or profit.

It is, finally, a system whose most serious sin may be its most subtle for it seems so rigged, so unfair, that it corrupts otherwise honest people by encouraging them to cheat.

Thirty and forty years ago you didn't hear people brag at social get-togethers about how they got their tax bill down by exploiting this loophole and engineering that credit. But now you do. And it's not considered bad behavior. After all, goes this thinking, what's immoral about cheating a system that is itself a cheat? That isn't a sin, it's a duty.

Our Federal tax system is, in short, utterly impossible, utterly unjust, and completely counterproductive. It's earned a rebellion, and it's time we rebelled.

We must move and move now for all the reasons I've named and more. The current system just doesn't work anymore. The underground economy and the cult of cheating prove that this is so. What to do? Well, we took our first step toward a second American revolution in 1981 when we lowered tax rates for every individual in this country. This increased our economic freedom and sparked one of the greatest economic expansions in our nation's history.

But now is the time to take the second step, the historic step for America's tax plan. Now is the time to turn our tax system around once and for all and make it more just, more equitable, more comprehensible. Now is the time to create a tax system that will encourage and not penalize the creation of wealth and jobs. Now is the time, in short, to get the Federal Government off our backs and out of our way.
You're familiar with our plan. We propose to simplify the rate structure down to just three rates -- 15, 25, and 35 percent. We propose to increase the personal exemption by almost a hundred percent, from just over $1,000 to $2,000 for every taxpayer and dependent with a provision to increase it still more if inflation occurs. We propose to end unproductive tax shelters so that no one will be able to hide in the havens that privilege builds. But we will retain those few tax advantages that speak directly to how Americans live their lives and how the American economy operates. For instance, the mortgage interest deduction stays for the house that you own and live in, and along with that, no less than $5,000 in other interest expenses would still be deductible.

We propose to lower the top corporate income tax rate from the current 46 percent to 33 percent, and we've proposed a new minimum tax to deal with those corporations and individuals that have managed not to pay any tax at all.

Now, you might see the present tax structure as a hornet's nest. Our plan is an attempt to burn away the webs and the nest and let the Sun shine in to start new, start clean, and start over. Is this long overdue reform revolutionary? I believe it is, but we conservatives don't launch revolutions lightly. There must be a clear and compelling need, and the reform that's proposed must bear within it the promise to better the lives of all of our citizens, and the reform must be achievable.

Well, our tax reform plan of 1985 satisfies those requirements. Beyond that, it will go a long way towards satisfying America's hunger for justice, thirst for opportunity, and search for freedom. By lowering the highest tax rates on individuals and businesses, we encourage the growth of our economy. Lower tax rates, of course, increase the after tax wages for additional work. And so, people will be able to profit once again from working overtime or at a second job. Lower tax rates will also increase the aftertax return on savings and investment. And so, people will tend to save and invest more. This will provide the money the economy needs to build additional factories or buy more machinery.

These are not just economic facts. What I am speaking about is a profound public good. For when a society has high levels of economic growth, most everyone benefits, especially the poor. More jobs are created, there's more money to spend on medical care and education, the standard of living increases, and all of this enhances the quality of life.

By simplifying the rate structure itself and by eliminating the devices by which the powerful evade their responsibilities, we ensure that people in the same circumstances will pay the same levels of tax. We'll ensure that those now earning lower incomes will not find themselves paying a greater percentage of their income in taxes than those earning higher incomes. We'll ensure that from the hard streets of the cities to the soft green hills of the suburbs the people of America will pay their fair share and no more.

So, I believe the virtues of our proposal are clear. You'll know that your neighbor is paying roughly what you are, that no one will be able to rig the system to his benefit. You'll know that the tax rates themselves won't creep up and mug you just as you start to succeed in the world. And we'll all know that those least able to pay will pay little or nothing.

But what is the broader purpose of our tax proposal? Well, I'm glad to be standing in front of the House of Burgesses as I address that question. The members who spoke in this capital said no to taxes because they loved freedom. They argued, ``Why should the fruits of our labors go to the Crown across the sea?'' Well, in the same sense, we ask today: Why should the fruits of our labors go to that Capitol across the river?

You know, we have a saying among some of us there in Washington: We're going to stick to it. If I sound like I'm talking about government as something else, I am. When we who are now there start talking about government as ``we'' instead of ``they'' we've been there too long. [Laughter]

When you read our tax code you realize that somehow we got lost along the way. Somewhere along the line, we stopped understanding that people worked not for the government, but for themselves; that they get up every morning and go out into the world to earn their bread, not to support a government, but to support their families. We, the citizens of the United States, have got to get public law back in line with private imperatives.

I see all of you out here and I'm sure that most of you have a wallet in your pocket or your purse. Just think of what you have in that wallet, how you earned it, and what you want to spend it on. That's your money. That's your effort. That's your freedom there. The disposition of that money belongs, by rights, to you.

I want a tax system that keeps as much of that money in your wallet as possible. The primary reason is moral. It's your money, after all. But the secondary reason is practical. You'll do more for the economy with it, and you'll do more to benefit your fellow citizen with it than the government will.

Now, I'm going to be speaking a great deal about tax reform over the next few weeks and months. And I expect it to be challenging. It's a shrewd turn of the American people that, when you announce a plan to help them, they stand back and scrutinize it and approach with a question: Now, how are you going to hurt me this time? [Laughter] Well, this is not an unreasonable question. So many times the American people have been promised better and been delivered worse. But I tell you from the bottom of my being, this is a plan that's going to help our country by helping every individual in it.

Our tax proposal will not increase the deficit; it is revenue neutral. It is not a tax increase; in fact, it's designed to be the first step toward lower tax rates in the future. When you simplify a thing, make its lines clear and clean, you make it much less vulnerable to quiet mischief and selfish tinkering. So, if some Congress of the future gets it in its head to increase taxes -- to raise the lowest personal tax rate from 15 percent to something higher -- the public will immediately see what is happening and understand what is happening. And they will rise up and resist, and they will be heard.

In a way what I'm trying to say is an unclean, unsound structure is vulnerable to mischief. When the house is a mess and everything's chaos, you're not likely to notice when something is missing. But when the house is clean and designed with balance you tend to notice if somebody tries to cart off the furniture. [Laughter]

Our forefathers fought a revolution for two reasons: to give liberty to a naturally independent people and to secure, in the words of a Burgess who met here, ``. . . Prosperity in the Community and Security to Individuals.'' The idea of freedom impelled them; it intoxicated them. And it's freedom that impels us still.

History's not a static thing. History moves; it never stops. And the American Revolution continues as we continue to push back the barriers to freedom. We, like the patriots of yesterday, are struggling to increase the measure of liberty enjoyed by out fellow citizens. We're struggling, like them, for self-government -- self-government for the family, self-government for the individual and the small business and the corporation.

And so, we offer this tax proposal of 1985 in the name of growth and fairness. We offer it to ensure generations of economic power for the citizens of this free and vital nation. We're doing it in the name of our children, and we're doing it in the memory of those towering souls who walked these streets and met in this capitol and together wrested justice from the heart of oppression. We offer this plan in memory of the patriots who took a handful of demoralized little colonies and invented a nation. We're doing it to continue their work.

I ask for your help. Without it, nothing can be accomplished; but with it, everything is possible. And so, in the truest sense, this great effort -- America's tax plan -- is in your hands. And for that I'm truly thankful. And I can only urge: America, go for it!

Thank you. Thank you, and God bless you. And thank you for inviting me. It's been wonderful to be here.

Thank you very much.


Note: The President spoke at 10:36 a.m. at the Colonial Capitol Building. The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation sponsored the celebration.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

It's time for an Angry one

I hope to God that we still have some military commanders who have this attitude about our nation’s role in the world. I realize that Dr. Strangelove is a dark comedy, but this does apply:

Read the dialog below the video:


"Well, boys, I reckon this is it — nuclear combat toe to toe with the Rooskies. Now look, boys, I ain't much of a hand at makin' speeches, but I got a pretty fair idea that something doggone important is goin' on back there. And I got a fair idea the kinda personal emotions that some of you fellas may be thinkin.' Heck, I reckon you wouldn't even be human bein's if you didn't have some pretty strong personal feelin's about nuclear combat. I want you to remember one thing, the folks back home is a-countin' on you and by golly, we ain't about to let 'em down. I tell you something else, if this thing turns out to be half as important as I figure it just might be, I'd say that you're all in line for some important promotions and personal citations when this thing's over with. That goes for ever' last one of you regardless of your race, color or your creed. Now let's get this thing on the hump — we got some flyin' to do." – Slim Pickens as B-52 pilot Major T. J. "King" Kong in Dr. Strangelove



So why is it so hard for our leaders here at home to stand strong about Vlad the Invader and the current Rooskie threat that has started in Georgia.

Again, The American people do not have to know any details. But if our president doesn’t appear strong, and take an initiative to show just how steadfast we are for the promulgation of liberty and democracy in this world, then soon, there will not be a country on this planet that will follow our lead. Because AMERICA has NOT lead, but followed in political landscapes in the last 20 years, we are weakening our own nation and our future.

In 1975, the rock group Styx released a song called Suite Madame Blue. This was written as their thoughts about the upcoming bicentennial. Ronald Reagan brought us out of those doldrums. But we are right back there today. When will America once again rise with pride to be that “shining city on a hill” that inspires the rest of the world to strive to reach that same level of greatness? When will we realize that no matter how bleak things seem to be, that with God’s grace, we are still the best hope for the world. We are blessed to live in this nation now and our best days are still ahead!

Lyrics below:


Time after time
I sit and I wait for your call
I know I'm a fool, but what can I say
Whatever the price I'll pay for you,
Madame Blue

Once long ago
A word from your lips and the world turned around
But somehow you've changed
You're so far away
I long for the past and dream of the days with you,
Madame Blue

Suite Madame Blue, gaze in your looking glass
You're not a child anymore
Suite Madame Blue, the future is all but past

Dressed in your jewels, you made your own rules
You conquered the world and more …………..heaven's door

America....America...America...

Red white and blue, gaze in your looking glass
You're not a child anymore
Red, white, and blue, the future is all but past
So lift up your heart, make a new start
And lead us away from here

The world is crying for true leadership that gives a crap about what is right and what is wrong, that makes a stand against evil and tyranny, that leads by example and not by following trends, and that is respected by the rest of the world for its might and its generosity.

President Bush has an opportunity right now to show that the United States of America has and angry one with two big brass companions!!! The genius of strength in the world is that the majority of it is due to perception. As long as the world sees us as weak and flaccid, then that is what we are.

I am not endorsing an unmitigated military solution, mind you. But I do believe that a show of strength is incredibly important in this day and time. We have to STOP and DEFEAT evil. We cannot battle evil on one front while letting it go unchecked on another. And as we know from experience, battles on different fronts can be fought in different ways.

America needs to get out of the recliner, turn off the golf channel, change out of Bermuda shorts, grab a rifle and defend the freedom we brag so much about!

Monday, August 11, 2008

FYI

"God grants liberty only to those who love it and are always ready to guard and defend it," - Daniel Webster